Skip to main content

Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests

Get our e-news! Sign up

small nav

  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Staff
    • Board of Trustees
    • Our History
    • Employment
    • Conservation Center
    • FAQs
    • Partners
    • Business Members
    • Annual Reports
    • Bylaws
    • Policies
  • log in
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

Main menu

  • What we do
    • Land Conservation
    • Education & Events
    • Advocacy
    • Forestry & Recreation
    • News & Features
    • Forest Notes & More Publications
  • Current Projects
    • Farming for the Future at Morrill Dairy Farm
    • Forest Society North at The Rocks Campaign
    • Mount Major Stewardship Fund
    • Recent Accomplishments
  • Visit & Explore
    • The Rocks
    • Conservation Center
    • Mount Major
    • Creek Farm
    • Forest Reservation Guide
    • Visitor Use Guidelines
  • Get Involved
    • Upcoming Events
    • Membership/Renewal
    • Support Our Work
    • Volunteer
    • Subscribe to E-news
  • Search

Search form

Donate
Menu

News

  • Northern Pass Plans Appeal to Supreme Court

    July 13, 2018

    CONCORD — Northern Pass officials plan to file an appeal with the state Supreme Court by an Aug. 13 deadline in an effort to jump-start a hydroelectric transmission project that a state committee denied.

    The Site Evaluation Committee on Thursday issued a 72-page written decision that ...

    Read more
  • SEC Denies Motion for Rehearing in Writing

    Jack Savage
    July 12, 2018

    The New Hampshire Site Evaluation Commitee (SEC) issued its anticipated written decision denying a Motion for Rehearing requested by Eversource ...

  • Regulators Refuse Northern Pass Reconsideration

    May 25, 2018

    CONCORD — State utility regulators voted 7-0 on Thursday to reject a motion to reconsider their decision turning down the $1.6 billion, 192-mile Northern Pass Transmission project.

    Project developer Eversource wanted the Site Evaluation Committee to vacate its February decision denying ...

    Read more

What's Next for Northern Pass?

How the appeal process works
Will Abbott
February 9, 2018
Northern Pass at SEC

Should Northern Pass choose to appeal the 7-0 decision of the New Hampshire Site Evaluation Committee (SEC) to deny Northern Pass a Certificate of Site and Facility, the first step would be to petition the SEC to reconsider their decision once the written decision is issued. The written decision is scheduled for release by the end of March.  While Northern Pass has suggested that it may request reconsideration before the written decision is issued, the New Hampshire Supreme Court has opined that in Administrative Law the written order is the trigger for a motion for reconsideration.

Northern Pass will have 30 days from the issue date of the written decision to request reconsideration.  The SEC will then have 10 days to respond, but may extend that deadline.  Assuming that a motion for reconsideration is denied, Northern Pass would then have 30 days to appeal to the Supreme Court. The Court can accept or reject the appeal.  If accepted, the appeal is likely to take months given the magnitude of the evidentiary record--even if the Court determines to expedite its review.

Assuming that the SEC issues its written decision on March 31, it would likely be mid-May before Northern Pass would be in a position to formally file an appeal with the Supreme Court. And it could be a year or more before the Court issues an opinion.  And, if the Court were to find in favor of Northern Pass on appeal due to some procedural error, the most likely remedy would be for the Court to remand the decision back to the SEC to correct whatever error it found in the SEC’s original decision.

The transcripts of the SEC’s deliberations on January 31 and February 1 on the issue of the orderly development are fascinating reading. The issue the SEC discusses is whether the Applicant has met its burden of proof. The Applicant must present sufficient evidence that the project would not have an undue adverse effect on the orderly development of the region. It becomes very clear during the SEC’s discussion that all seven members concluded that NP failed to present such evidence.  In fact, the evidence presented in the opinion of the seven decision-makers was woefully inadequate.  While NP may exercise its right to appeal, it is hard to see how the muscle of this 7-0 decision is likely to atrophy under further judicial scrutiny.        

Download the Forest Society Mobile App, powered by OuterSpatial

Available on the App Store
Get it on Google Play

Footer menu

  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests54 Portsmouth St.Concord, NH 03301
Phone: 603.224.9945Fax: 603.228.0423info@forestsociety.org
Land Trust Alliance accreditation logo